OneRouter supports Claude Code

How Kimi-K2-Thinking Stays Stable in Long Tasks with Claude Code

How Kimi-K2-Thinking Stays Stable in Long Tasks with Claude Code
How Kimi-K2-Thinking Stays Stable in Long Tasks with Claude Code
How Kimi-K2-Thinking Stays Stable in Long Tasks with Claude Code
Date

Dec 15, 2025

Author

Andrew Zheng

Developers and researchers today face three major challenges when selecting large language models: sustaining long-horizon reasoning, managing context limits, and controlling operational costs. Traditional closed models like Claude Sonnet 4 and GPT-5 offer strong performance but become costly and constrained when handling multi-step or tool-based workflows.

This article introduces Kimi-K2-Thinking—an open, agent-oriented alternative that combines step-by-step reasoning, dynamic tool integration, and massive context capacity. Through comparisons, benchmarks, and setup guides, it explains how Kimi-K2 solves the pain points of coherence, scale, and affordability in long, complex AI tasks.


What Advantages Does Kimi-K2-Thinking Have?

Kimi-K2 Thinking was built as a “thinking agent” that interleaves step-by-step Chain-of-Thought reasoning with dynamic function/tool calls. Unlike typical models that may drift or lose coherence after a few tool uses, Kimi-K2 maintains stable goal-directed behavior across 200–300 sequential tool invocations without human intervention.

This is a major leap: prior open models tended to degrade after 30–50 steps. In other words, Kimi-K2 can handle hundreds of execute steps in one session while staying on track to solve complex problems.

Anthropic’s Claude was previously known for such “interleaved thinking” with tools, but Kimi-K2 brings this capability to the open-source realm

Line chart showing Kimi-K2 maintaining high coherence across 300 tool calls, while typical open models rapidly degrade.


Test Kimi K2 Thinking Now!

The architecture balances scale, efficiency, and stability—allowing Kimi-K2-Thinking to sustain complex, tool-rich reasoning over long sequences.


Architecture Feature

Practical Advantage

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) 

Expands model capacity without increasing cost; selects the most relevant experts for each task.

1T parameters / 32B activated

Combines large-scale knowledge with efficient computation.

61 layers with 1 dense layer

Keeps reasoning deep yet coherent across steps.

384 experts, 8 active per token

Improves specialization and adaptability to diverse problems.

256K context length

Processes very long inputs and maintains continuity in long reasoning chains.

MLA (Multi-Head Latent Attention)

Strengthens long-range focus and reduces memory load.

SwiGLU activation

Stabilizes training and supports smooth, precise reasoning.


Which Model Performs Better, Kimi-K2-Thinking or Sonnet 4?

Kimi-K2 performs close to GPT-5 and Claude on major math benchmarks, but it is slightly behind GPT-5 and Claude in MMLU-Pro/Redux, Longform Writing and Code.

Kimi-K2 outperforms when tools are enabled or tasks require long chained reasoning (HLE w/ tools = 44.9 vs Claude 32.0). It bridges the gap between closed models like Claude and open-source systems, excelling in sustained, tool-rich problem solving.


This chart uses real HLE benchmark data, showing Kimi-K2 Thinking’s clear advantage once tools are enabled and in heavy reasoning tasks, where it surpasses Claude Sonnet 4.5 by 13–9 points.


Category

Benchmark

Setting

Kimi K2 Thinking

GPT-5 (High)

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)

Kimi K2 0905

DeepSeek-V3.2

Grok-4

Reasoning / Math

HLE

no tools

23.9

26.3

19.8

7.9

19.8

25.4


HLE

w/ tools

44.9

41.7

32.0

21.7

20.3

41.0


HLE

heavy

51.0

42.0

50.7


AIME25

no tools

94.5

94.6

87.0

51.0

89.3

91.7


AIME25

w/ python

99.1

99.6

100.0

75.2

58.1

98.8


AIME25

heavy

100.0

100.0

100.0


HMMT25

no tools

89.4

93.3

74.6

38.8

83.6

90.0


HMMT25

w/ python

95.1

96.7

88.8

70.4

49.5

93.9


HMMT25

heavy

97.5

100.0

96.7


IMO-AnswerBench

no tools

78.6

76.0

65.9

45.8

76.0

73.1


GPQA

no tools

84.5

85.7

83.4

74.2

79.9

87.5

General Tasks

MMLU-Pro

no tools

84.6

87.1

87.5

81.9

85.0


MMLU-Redux

no tools

94.4

95.3

95.6

92.7

93.7


Longform Writing

no tools

73.8

71.4

79.8

62.8

72.5


HealthBench

no tools

58.0

67.2

44.2

43.8

46.9

Agentic Search

BrowseComp

w/ tools

60.2

54.9

24.1

7.4

40.1


BrowseComp-ZH

w/ tools

62.3

63.0

42.4

22.2

47.9


Seal-0

w/ tools

56.3

51.4

53.4

25.2

38.5


FinSearchComp-T3

w/ tools

47.4

48.5

44.0

10.4

27.0


Frames

w/ tools

87.0

86.0

85.0

58.1

80.2

Coding Tasks

SWE-bench Verified

w/ tools

71.3

74.9

77.2

69.2

67.8


SWE-bench Multilingual

w/ tools

61.1

55.3

68.0

55.9

57.9


Multi-SWE-bench

w/ tools

41.9

39.3

44.3

33.5

30.6


SciCode

no tools

44.8

42.9

44.7

30.7

37.7


LiveCodeBench V6

no tools

83.1

87.0

64.0

56.1

74.1


OJ-Bench (cpp)

no tools

48.7

56.2

30.4

25.5

38.2


Terminal-Bench

w/ simulated tools (JSON)

47.1

43.8

51.0

44.5

Test Kimi K2 Thinking Now!

  • no tools: pure language reasoning, no external tools.

  • w/ tools: can call external tools (e.g., search, code).

  • w/ python: uses only Python for computation.

  • w/ simulated tools (JSON): simulates tool calls in JSON format.

  • heavy: high-intensity, long-chain reasoning test.


How Large Is the Cost Gap Between Kimi-K2-Thinking and Claude Sonnet 4?

Kimi-K2 delivers similar capabilities to Claude Sonnet 4 at roughly 75–80% lower cost. Its pricing stays flat even for long contexts (up to 256K tokens) or frequent tool use, while Claude’s costs rise sharply for extended contexts and agent actions. In short, Kimi-K2 offers Claude/GPT-level performance with far better cost efficiency for complex, long-horizon reasoning tasks.


Kimi-K2 Thinking’s API costs roughly one-fifth of Claude Sonnet 4’s, making it far more economical for long coding or reasoning sessions.


How to Use Kimi-K2-Thinking in Claude Code?

OneRouter currently offers the most affordable full-context Kimi-K2-Thinking API.

OneRouter provides APIs with 262K context, and costs of $0.6/input and $2.5/output, supporting structured output and function calling, which delivers strong support for maximizing Kimi K2 Thinking's code agent potential.



Use Kimi-K2-Thinking with Claude Code

Now, OneRouter provides Anthropic SDK compatible LLM API services, enabling you to easily use OneRouter LLM models in Claude Code to complete tasks. Please refer to the guide below to complete the integration process.

1. Setup your OneRouter account & API keys

The first step to start using OneRouter is to create an account and get your API key.

2. Install Claude Code

Before installing Claude Code, please ensure your local environment has Node.js 18 or higher installed.

To install Claude Code, run the following command:

npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code

3. Setup the Claude Code configuration

Open the terminal and set up environment variables as follows:

# Set the Anthropic SDK compatible API endpoint provided by OneRouter.
export ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL="https://llm.onerouter.pro"
export ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN="<OneRouter API Key>"

# Set the model provided by OneRouter.
export ANTHROPIC_MODEL="kimi-k2-thinking"
export ANTHROPIC_SMALL_FAST_MODEL="kimi-k2-thinking"
export ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_HAIKU_MODEL="kimi-k2-thinking"
export ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_OPUS_MODEL="kimi-k2-thinking"
export ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_SONNET_MODEL="kimi-k2-thinking"

4. Start your first session

Next, navigate to your project directory and start Claude Code. You will see the Claude Code prompt inside a new interactive session:

cd <your-project-directory>
claude


How Can Enable Quick Switching Between Claude, GLM, and Kimi Models?

OneRouter General Conversion Layer lets you run the Claude Agent SDK against any model in OneRouter—without changing your agent logic.

With the OneRouter General Conversion Layer, developers can keep using the same SDK APIs. The conversion layer translates Anthropic-style Messages requests to whichever upstream (Anthropic、OpenAI or other models in OneRouter) matches the model string you provide.


Under What Conditions Should Developers Switch to Kimi-K2-Thinking?

When to Use Kimi-K2 Thinking — Task Characteristics and Matching Strengths

1. Long-Horizon / Agentic Tasks

Task traits: multi-step workflows, autonomous tool calls, continuous reasoning (e.g., research assistants, data-mining agents, or auto-coders).
Kimi-K2 solves: maintains coherent reasoning across hundreds of steps; integrates planning, searching, and coding without drifting—where GPT-5 or Claude may lose focus over long sequences.

2. Large-Context Tasks 

Task traits: require feeding long documents, full codebases, or multi-file inputs at once.
Kimi-K2 solves: offers a native 256 K token context with flat pricing; processes massive input without chunking or the high long-context fees seen in Claude or GPT-4.

3. Cost-Sensitive Deployments

Task traits: large-scale runs or tight budgets (millions of tokens daily).
Kimi-K2 solves: delivers Claude/GPT-level reasoning at roughly 4–6× lower cost, making advanced reasoning affordable for startups and sustained workloads.

4. Domain Benchmark Parity

Task traits: complex reasoning, structured QA, or mathematical logic where closed models used to dominate.
Kimi-K2 solves: matches or exceeds GPT-5 and Claude 4.5 on AIME, HMMT, and GPQA Diamond, proving that open models can now perform at frontier levels in reasoning-heavy domains.

Kimi-K2-Thinking bridges the gap between closed proprietary systems and open innovation. It delivers near-Claude performance with 75–80% lower cost, supports 256K context windows, and sustains hundreds of reasoning or tool-use steps without drift. For developers needing deep reasoning, agentic workflows, or open-source deployment, Kimi-K2 offers a practical, scalable, and transparent solution that redefines cost-efficiency in advanced AI reasoning.


Frequently Asked Questions

What makes Kimi-K2-Thinking different from Claude Sonnet 4?

Kimi-K2 maintains coherent reasoning across 200–300 tool calls and costs up to 5× less, while Claude Sonnet 4’s price rises sharply with longer contexts and tool actions.

Is Kimi-K2-Thinking suitable for coding?

Yes. It can write and debug code effectively, but it performs best on reasoning-heavy or multi-step tool-driven projects rather than simple one-shot coding.

How large is Kimi-K2-Thinking’s context window?

It supports 256K tokens by default, enabling full codebase or document reasoning in one pass—without the premium long-context charges found in Claude or GPT models.


OneRouter provides a unified API that gives you access to hundreds of AI models through a single endpoint, while automatically handling fallbacks and selecting the most cost-effective options. Get started with just a few lines of code using your preferred SDK or framework.

Developers and researchers today face three major challenges when selecting large language models: sustaining long-horizon reasoning, managing context limits, and controlling operational costs. Traditional closed models like Claude Sonnet 4 and GPT-5 offer strong performance but become costly and constrained when handling multi-step or tool-based workflows.

This article introduces Kimi-K2-Thinking—an open, agent-oriented alternative that combines step-by-step reasoning, dynamic tool integration, and massive context capacity. Through comparisons, benchmarks, and setup guides, it explains how Kimi-K2 solves the pain points of coherence, scale, and affordability in long, complex AI tasks.


What Advantages Does Kimi-K2-Thinking Have?

Kimi-K2 Thinking was built as a “thinking agent” that interleaves step-by-step Chain-of-Thought reasoning with dynamic function/tool calls. Unlike typical models that may drift or lose coherence after a few tool uses, Kimi-K2 maintains stable goal-directed behavior across 200–300 sequential tool invocations without human intervention.

This is a major leap: prior open models tended to degrade after 30–50 steps. In other words, Kimi-K2 can handle hundreds of execute steps in one session while staying on track to solve complex problems.

Anthropic’s Claude was previously known for such “interleaved thinking” with tools, but Kimi-K2 brings this capability to the open-source realm

Line chart showing Kimi-K2 maintaining high coherence across 300 tool calls, while typical open models rapidly degrade.


Test Kimi K2 Thinking Now!

The architecture balances scale, efficiency, and stability—allowing Kimi-K2-Thinking to sustain complex, tool-rich reasoning over long sequences.


Architecture Feature

Practical Advantage

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) 

Expands model capacity without increasing cost; selects the most relevant experts for each task.

1T parameters / 32B activated

Combines large-scale knowledge with efficient computation.

61 layers with 1 dense layer

Keeps reasoning deep yet coherent across steps.

384 experts, 8 active per token

Improves specialization and adaptability to diverse problems.

256K context length

Processes very long inputs and maintains continuity in long reasoning chains.

MLA (Multi-Head Latent Attention)

Strengthens long-range focus and reduces memory load.

SwiGLU activation

Stabilizes training and supports smooth, precise reasoning.


Which Model Performs Better, Kimi-K2-Thinking or Sonnet 4?

Kimi-K2 performs close to GPT-5 and Claude on major math benchmarks, but it is slightly behind GPT-5 and Claude in MMLU-Pro/Redux, Longform Writing and Code.

Kimi-K2 outperforms when tools are enabled or tasks require long chained reasoning (HLE w/ tools = 44.9 vs Claude 32.0). It bridges the gap between closed models like Claude and open-source systems, excelling in sustained, tool-rich problem solving.


This chart uses real HLE benchmark data, showing Kimi-K2 Thinking’s clear advantage once tools are enabled and in heavy reasoning tasks, where it surpasses Claude Sonnet 4.5 by 13–9 points.


Category

Benchmark

Setting

Kimi K2 Thinking

GPT-5 (High)

Claude Sonnet 4.5 (Thinking)

Kimi K2 0905

DeepSeek-V3.2

Grok-4

Reasoning / Math

HLE

no tools

23.9

26.3

19.8

7.9

19.8

25.4


HLE

w/ tools

44.9

41.7

32.0

21.7

20.3

41.0


HLE

heavy

51.0

42.0

50.7


AIME25

no tools

94.5

94.6

87.0

51.0

89.3

91.7


AIME25

w/ python

99.1

99.6

100.0

75.2

58.1

98.8


AIME25

heavy

100.0

100.0

100.0


HMMT25

no tools

89.4

93.3

74.6

38.8

83.6

90.0


HMMT25

w/ python

95.1

96.7

88.8

70.4

49.5

93.9


HMMT25

heavy

97.5

100.0

96.7


IMO-AnswerBench

no tools

78.6

76.0

65.9

45.8

76.0

73.1


GPQA

no tools

84.5

85.7

83.4

74.2

79.9

87.5

General Tasks

MMLU-Pro

no tools

84.6

87.1

87.5

81.9

85.0


MMLU-Redux

no tools

94.4

95.3

95.6

92.7

93.7


Longform Writing

no tools

73.8

71.4

79.8

62.8

72.5


HealthBench

no tools

58.0

67.2

44.2

43.8

46.9

Agentic Search

BrowseComp

w/ tools

60.2

54.9

24.1

7.4

40.1


BrowseComp-ZH

w/ tools

62.3

63.0

42.4

22.2

47.9


Seal-0

w/ tools

56.3

51.4

53.4

25.2

38.5


FinSearchComp-T3

w/ tools

47.4

48.5

44.0

10.4

27.0


Frames

w/ tools

87.0

86.0

85.0

58.1

80.2

Coding Tasks

SWE-bench Verified

w/ tools

71.3

74.9

77.2

69.2

67.8


SWE-bench Multilingual

w/ tools

61.1

55.3

68.0

55.9

57.9


Multi-SWE-bench

w/ tools

41.9

39.3

44.3

33.5

30.6


SciCode

no tools

44.8

42.9

44.7

30.7

37.7


LiveCodeBench V6

no tools

83.1

87.0

64.0

56.1

74.1


OJ-Bench (cpp)

no tools

48.7

56.2

30.4

25.5

38.2


Terminal-Bench

w/ simulated tools (JSON)

47.1

43.8

51.0

44.5

Test Kimi K2 Thinking Now!

  • no tools: pure language reasoning, no external tools.

  • w/ tools: can call external tools (e.g., search, code).

  • w/ python: uses only Python for computation.

  • w/ simulated tools (JSON): simulates tool calls in JSON format.

  • heavy: high-intensity, long-chain reasoning test.


How Large Is the Cost Gap Between Kimi-K2-Thinking and Claude Sonnet 4?

Kimi-K2 delivers similar capabilities to Claude Sonnet 4 at roughly 75–80% lower cost. Its pricing stays flat even for long contexts (up to 256K tokens) or frequent tool use, while Claude’s costs rise sharply for extended contexts and agent actions. In short, Kimi-K2 offers Claude/GPT-level performance with far better cost efficiency for complex, long-horizon reasoning tasks.


Kimi-K2 Thinking’s API costs roughly one-fifth of Claude Sonnet 4’s, making it far more economical for long coding or reasoning sessions.


How to Use Kimi-K2-Thinking in Claude Code?

OneRouter currently offers the most affordable full-context Kimi-K2-Thinking API.

OneRouter provides APIs with 262K context, and costs of $0.6/input and $2.5/output, supporting structured output and function calling, which delivers strong support for maximizing Kimi K2 Thinking's code agent potential.



Use Kimi-K2-Thinking with Claude Code

Now, OneRouter provides Anthropic SDK compatible LLM API services, enabling you to easily use OneRouter LLM models in Claude Code to complete tasks. Please refer to the guide below to complete the integration process.

1. Setup your OneRouter account & API keys

The first step to start using OneRouter is to create an account and get your API key.

2. Install Claude Code

Before installing Claude Code, please ensure your local environment has Node.js 18 or higher installed.

To install Claude Code, run the following command:

npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code

3. Setup the Claude Code configuration

Open the terminal and set up environment variables as follows:

# Set the Anthropic SDK compatible API endpoint provided by OneRouter.
export ANTHROPIC_BASE_URL="https://llm.onerouter.pro"
export ANTHROPIC_AUTH_TOKEN="<OneRouter API Key>"

# Set the model provided by OneRouter.
export ANTHROPIC_MODEL="kimi-k2-thinking"
export ANTHROPIC_SMALL_FAST_MODEL="kimi-k2-thinking"
export ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_HAIKU_MODEL="kimi-k2-thinking"
export ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_OPUS_MODEL="kimi-k2-thinking"
export ANTHROPIC_DEFAULT_SONNET_MODEL="kimi-k2-thinking"

4. Start your first session

Next, navigate to your project directory and start Claude Code. You will see the Claude Code prompt inside a new interactive session:

cd <your-project-directory>
claude


How Can Enable Quick Switching Between Claude, GLM, and Kimi Models?

OneRouter General Conversion Layer lets you run the Claude Agent SDK against any model in OneRouter—without changing your agent logic.

With the OneRouter General Conversion Layer, developers can keep using the same SDK APIs. The conversion layer translates Anthropic-style Messages requests to whichever upstream (Anthropic、OpenAI or other models in OneRouter) matches the model string you provide.


Under What Conditions Should Developers Switch to Kimi-K2-Thinking?

When to Use Kimi-K2 Thinking — Task Characteristics and Matching Strengths

1. Long-Horizon / Agentic Tasks

Task traits: multi-step workflows, autonomous tool calls, continuous reasoning (e.g., research assistants, data-mining agents, or auto-coders).
Kimi-K2 solves: maintains coherent reasoning across hundreds of steps; integrates planning, searching, and coding without drifting—where GPT-5 or Claude may lose focus over long sequences.

2. Large-Context Tasks 

Task traits: require feeding long documents, full codebases, or multi-file inputs at once.
Kimi-K2 solves: offers a native 256 K token context with flat pricing; processes massive input without chunking or the high long-context fees seen in Claude or GPT-4.

3. Cost-Sensitive Deployments

Task traits: large-scale runs or tight budgets (millions of tokens daily).
Kimi-K2 solves: delivers Claude/GPT-level reasoning at roughly 4–6× lower cost, making advanced reasoning affordable for startups and sustained workloads.

4. Domain Benchmark Parity

Task traits: complex reasoning, structured QA, or mathematical logic where closed models used to dominate.
Kimi-K2 solves: matches or exceeds GPT-5 and Claude 4.5 on AIME, HMMT, and GPQA Diamond, proving that open models can now perform at frontier levels in reasoning-heavy domains.

Kimi-K2-Thinking bridges the gap between closed proprietary systems and open innovation. It delivers near-Claude performance with 75–80% lower cost, supports 256K context windows, and sustains hundreds of reasoning or tool-use steps without drift. For developers needing deep reasoning, agentic workflows, or open-source deployment, Kimi-K2 offers a practical, scalable, and transparent solution that redefines cost-efficiency in advanced AI reasoning.


Frequently Asked Questions

What makes Kimi-K2-Thinking different from Claude Sonnet 4?

Kimi-K2 maintains coherent reasoning across 200–300 tool calls and costs up to 5× less, while Claude Sonnet 4’s price rises sharply with longer contexts and tool actions.

Is Kimi-K2-Thinking suitable for coding?

Yes. It can write and debug code effectively, but it performs best on reasoning-heavy or multi-step tool-driven projects rather than simple one-shot coding.

How large is Kimi-K2-Thinking’s context window?

It supports 256K tokens by default, enabling full codebase or document reasoning in one pass—without the premium long-context charges found in Claude or GPT models.


OneRouter provides a unified API that gives you access to hundreds of AI models through a single endpoint, while automatically handling fallbacks and selecting the most cost-effective options. Get started with just a few lines of code using your preferred SDK or framework.

Scale without limits

Seamlessly integrate OneRouter with just a few lines of code and unlock unlimited AI power.

Scale without limits

Seamlessly integrate OneRouter with just a few lines of code and unlock unlimited AI power.

Scale without limits

Seamlessly integrate OneRouter with just a few lines of code and unlock unlimited AI power.